Changes

              
    

          
          
        
        

            
f
1
{
f
1
{
            
2
  "author": null, 
2
  "author": null, 
            
3
  "author_email": null, 
3
  "author_email": null, 
            
4
  "conforms_to": "http://www.opengis.net/def/crs/EPSG/0/4326", 
4
  "conforms_to": "http://www.opengis.net/def/crs/EPSG/0/4326", 
            
5
  "contact_name": "Food and Agriculture Organization of the United 
5
  "contact_name": "Food and Agriculture Organization of the United 
            
6
Nations (FAO)", 
6
Nations (FAO)", 
            
7
  "creator_user_id": "f96ad893-f291-40eb-b0f3-5bef533dcc1e", 
7
  "creator_user_id": "f96ad893-f291-40eb-b0f3-5bef533dcc1e", 
            
8
  "documentation": 
8
  "documentation": 
            
9
.iiasa.ac.at/Research/LUC/GAEZv3.0/docs/GAEZ_Model_Documentation.pdf", 
9
.iiasa.ac.at/Research/LUC/GAEZv3.0/docs/GAEZ_Model_Documentation.pdf", 
            
10
  "groups": [], 
10
  "groups": [], 
            
11
  "id": "26d153ba-70d4-4c4a-a1a9-988a9086a370", 
11
  "id": "26d153ba-70d4-4c4a-a1a9-988a9086a370", 
            
12
  "is_part_of": "", 
12
  "is_part_of": "", 
            
13
  "is_version_of": "", 
13
  "is_version_of": "", 
            
14
  "isopen": false, 
14
  "isopen": false, 
            
15
  "license_id": "", 
15
  "license_id": "", 
            
16
  "license_title": "", 
16
  "license_title": "", 
            
17
  "maintainer": null, 
17
  "maintainer": null, 
            
18
  "maintainer_email": null, 
18
  "maintainer_email": null, 
            
19
  "metadata_created": "2021-04-30T13:59:40.610111", 
19
  "metadata_created": "2021-04-30T13:59:40.610111", 
            
n
20
  "metadata_modified": "2021-08-09T11:30:07.027085", 
n
20
  "metadata_modified": "2021-09-14T10:45:22.962062", 
            
21
  "name": "potyield", 
21
  "name": "potyield", 
            
t
22
  "notes": "Agro-climatic yield\r\nrelated publication: 
t
22
  "notes": "\"The Agro\u2010Ecological Zones (AEZ) approach is based 
            
23
sa.ac.at/Research/LUC/GAEZv3.0/docs/GAEZ_Model_Documentation.pdf\r\n", 
23
on principles of land evaluation (FAO 1976, 1984 and 2007). The AEZ 
            
24
concept was originally developed by the Food and Agriculture 
            
25
organization of the United Nations (FAO). FAO, with the collaboration 
            
26
of IIASA has over time, further developed and applied the AEZ 
            
27
methodology, supporting databases and software packages. The current 
            
28
Global AEZ (GAEZ v 3.0) provides a major update of data and extension 
            
29
of the methodology compared to the release of GAEZ in 2002 (Fischer, 
            
30
et. al., 2002). GAEZ v 3.0 incorporates two important new global data 
            
31
sets on \u201cActual Yield and Production\u2019 and \u201cYield and 
            
32
Production Gaps\u201d between potentials and actual yield and 
            
33
production. Geo\u2010referenced global climate, soil and terrain data 
            
34
are combined into a land resources database, commonly assembled on the 
            
35
basis of global grids, typically at 5 arc\u2010minute and 30 
            
36
arc\u2010second resolutions. Climatic data comprises precipitation, 
            
37
temperature, wind speed, sunshine hours and relative humidity, which 
            
38
are used to compile agronomically meaningful climate resources 
            
39
inventories including quantified thermal and moisture regimes in space 
            
40
and time.\" <br>\r\n*Fischer, G.; Nachtergaele, F. O.; Prieler, S.; 
            
41
Teixeira, E.; Toth, G.; van Velthuizen, H. et al. (2016): Global 
            
42
Agro-ecological Zones (GAEZ v3.0) - Model Documentation.*\r\n", 
            
24
  "num_resources": 0, 
43
  "num_resources": 0, 
            
25
  "num_tags": 2, 
44
  "num_tags": 2, 
            
26
  "organization": {
45
  "organization": {
            
27
    "approval_status": "approved", 
46
    "approval_status": "approved", 
            
28
    "created": "2021-01-08T11:55:37.205088", 
47
    "created": "2021-01-08T11:55:37.205088", 
            
29
    "description": "", 
48
    "description": "", 
            
30
    "id": "594a3901-9ffa-4e91-b828-84f89554ab4c", 
49
    "id": "594a3901-9ffa-4e91-b828-84f89554ab4c", 
            
31
    "image_url": 
50
    "image_url": 
            
32
"https://tu-dresden.de/++theme++tud.theme.webcms2/img/tud-logo.svg", 
51
"https://tu-dresden.de/++theme++tud.theme.webcms2/img/tud-logo.svg", 
            
33
    "is_organization": true, 
52
    "is_organization": true, 
            
34
    "name": "tud", 
53
    "name": "tud", 
            
35
    "state": "active", 
54
    "state": "active", 
            
36
    "title": "TUD", 
55
    "title": "TUD", 
            
37
    "type": "organization"
56
    "type": "organization"
            
38
  }, 
57
  }, 
            
39
  "owner_org": "594a3901-9ffa-4e91-b828-84f89554ab4c", 
58
  "owner_org": "594a3901-9ffa-4e91-b828-84f89554ab4c", 
            
40
  "private": false, 
59
  "private": false, 
            
41
  "quality_metrics": 
60
  "quality_metrics": 
            
42
ompletenessOmmissionAsNumberOfMissingItems\":{\"label\":\"Completeness 
61
ompletenessOmmissionAsNumberOfMissingItems\":{\"label\":\"Completeness 
            
43
Ommission as Number of Missing Items\",\"values\":{\"value of quality 
62
Ommission as Number of Missing Items\",\"values\":{\"value of quality 
            
44
metric\":\"8713437\",\"ground truth dataset\":\"\",\"confidence 
63
metric\":\"8713437\",\"ground truth dataset\":\"\",\"confidence 
            
45
term\":\"\",\"confidence value\":\"\",\"thematic 
64
term\":\"\",\"confidence value\":\"\",\"thematic 
            
46
representativity\":\"\",\"spatial 
65
representativity\":\"\",\"spatial 
            
47
representativity\":\"global\",\"temporal 
66
representativity\":\"global\",\"temporal 
            
48
representativity\":\"\",\"name of quality 
67
representativity\":\"\",\"name of quality 
            
49
source\":\"MetadataFromGeodata Extraction Tool\",\"type of quality 
68
source\":\"MetadataFromGeodata Extraction Tool\",\"type of quality 
            
50
source\":\"software\",\"link to quality 
69
source\":\"software\",\"link to quality 
            
51
#completenessOmmissionAsRateOfMissingItems\":{\"label\":\"Completeness 
70
#completenessOmmissionAsRateOfMissingItems\":{\"label\":\"Completeness 
            
52
Ommission as Rate of Missing Items\",\"values\":{\"value of quality 
71
Ommission as Rate of Missing Items\",\"values\":{\"value of quality 
            
53
metric\":\"96.8074\",\"ground truth dataset\":\"\",\"confidence 
72
metric\":\"96.8074\",\"ground truth dataset\":\"\",\"confidence 
            
54
term\":\"\",\"confidence value\":\"\",\"thematic 
73
term\":\"\",\"confidence value\":\"\",\"thematic 
            
55
representativity\":\"\",\"spatial 
74
representativity\":\"\",\"spatial 
            
56
representativity\":\"global\",\"temporal 
75
representativity\":\"global\",\"temporal 
            
57
representativity\":\"\",\"name of quality 
76
representativity\":\"\",\"name of quality 
            
58
source\":\"MetadataFromGeodata Extraction Tool\",\"type of quality 
77
source\":\"MetadataFromGeodata Extraction Tool\",\"type of quality 
            
59
source\":\"software\",\"link to quality 
78
source\":\"software\",\"link to quality 
            
60
ributeValueUncertainityAt99SignificanceLevel\":{\"label\":\"Quantitive 
79
ributeValueUncertainityAt99SignificanceLevel\":{\"label\":\"Quantitive 
            
61
Attribute Accuracy as Attribute Value Uncertainity at 99% Significance 
80
Attribute Accuracy as Attribute Value Uncertainity at 99% Significance 
            
62
Level\",\"values\":{\"value of quality metric\":\"0.75\",\"ground 
81
Level\",\"values\":{\"value of quality metric\":\"0.75\",\"ground 
            
63
truth dataset\":\"\",\"confidence term\":\"\",\"confidence 
82
truth dataset\":\"\",\"confidence term\":\"\",\"confidence 
            
64
value\":\"\",\"thematic representativity\":\"\",\"spatial 
83
value\":\"\",\"thematic representativity\":\"\",\"spatial 
            
65
representativity\":\"global\",\"temporal 
84
representativity\":\"global\",\"temporal 
            
66
representativity\":\"\",\"name of quality source\":\"Spatio-Temporal 
85
representativity\":\"\",\"name of quality source\":\"Spatio-Temporal 
            
67
Dynamics of Maize Potential Yield and Yield Gaps in Northeast China 
86
Dynamics of Maize Potential Yield and Yield Gaps in Northeast China 
            
68
from 1990 to 2015\",\"type of quality source\":\"publication\",\"link 
87
from 1990 to 2015\",\"type of quality source\":\"publication\",\"link 
            
69
to quality 
88
to quality 
            
70
nsistencyAsValuePhysicalStructureConflictsNumber\":{\"label\":\"Format 
89
nsistencyAsValuePhysicalStructureConflictsNumber\":{\"label\":\"Format 
            
71
Consistency as Value Physical Structure Conflicts 
90
Consistency as Value Physical Structure Conflicts 
            
72
Number\",\"values\":{\"value of quality metric\":\"true\",\"ground 
91
Number\",\"values\":{\"value of quality metric\":\"true\",\"ground 
            
73
truth dataset\":\"\",\"confidence term\":\"\",\"confidence 
92
truth dataset\":\"\",\"confidence term\":\"\",\"confidence 
            
74
value\":\"\",\"thematic representativity\":\"\",\"spatial 
93
value\":\"\",\"thematic representativity\":\"\",\"spatial 
            
75
representativity\":\"\",\"temporal representativity\":\"\",\"name of 
94
representativity\":\"\",\"temporal representativity\":\"\",\"name of 
            
76
quality source\":\"MetadataFromGeodata Extraction Tool\",\"type of 
95
quality source\":\"MetadataFromGeodata Extraction Tool\",\"type of 
            
77
quality source\":\"software\",\"link to quality 
96
quality source\":\"software\",\"link to quality 
            
78
es/quality-elements#temporalConsistencyAsValue\":{\"label\":\"Temporal 
97
es/quality-elements#temporalConsistencyAsValue\":{\"label\":\"Temporal 
            
79
Consistency as Value\",\"values\":{\"value of quality 
98
Consistency as Value\",\"values\":{\"value of quality 
            
80
metric\":\"false\",\"ground truth dataset\":\"\",\"confidence 
99
metric\":\"false\",\"ground truth dataset\":\"\",\"confidence 
            
81
term\":\"\",\"confidence value\":\"\",\"thematic 
100
term\":\"\",\"confidence value\":\"\",\"thematic 
            
82
representativity\":\"\",\"spatial representativity\":\"\",\"temporal 
101
representativity\":\"\",\"spatial representativity\":\"\",\"temporal 
            
83
representativity\":\"\",\"name of quality source\":\"\",\"type of 
102
representativity\":\"\",\"name of quality source\":\"\",\"type of 
            
84
quality source\":\"manual analysis\",\"link to quality 
103
quality source\":\"manual analysis\",\"link to quality 
            
85
source\":\"\"}}}", 
104
source\":\"\"}}}", 
            
86
  "relationships_as_object": [], 
105
  "relationships_as_object": [], 
            
87
  "relationships_as_subject": [], 
106
  "relationships_as_subject": [], 
            
88
  "resources": [], 
107
  "resources": [], 
            
89
  "spatial": 
108
  "spatial": 
            
90
7],[188.4375,-85.05112877980659],[-170.15625,-85.05112877980659]]]]}", 
109
7],[188.4375,-85.05112877980659],[-170.15625,-85.05112877980659]]]]}", 
            
91
  "spatial_resolution": "0.08333", 
110
  "spatial_resolution": "0.08333", 
            
92
  "spatial_resolution_type": "angular", 
111
  "spatial_resolution_type": "angular", 
            
93
  "state": "active", 
112
  "state": "active", 
            
94
  "tags": [
113
  "tags": [
            
95
    {
114
    {
            
96
      "display_name": "Agriculture", 
115
      "display_name": "Agriculture", 
            
97
      "id": "089ec053-0d26-4c21-becd-40b02c26f0c0", 
116
      "id": "089ec053-0d26-4c21-becd-40b02c26f0c0", 
            
98
      "name": "Agriculture", 
117
      "name": "Agriculture", 
            
99
      "state": "active", 
118
      "state": "active", 
            
100
      "vocabulary_id": null
119
      "vocabulary_id": null
            
101
    }, 
120
    }, 
            
102
    {
121
    {
            
103
      "display_name": "Ecology", 
122
      "display_name": "Ecology", 
            
104
      "id": "eeca70af-a1af-4503-a8f0-c0cba6abd056", 
123
      "id": "eeca70af-a1af-4503-a8f0-c0cba6abd056", 
            
105
      "name": "Ecology", 
124
      "name": "Ecology", 
            
106
      "state": "active", 
125
      "state": "active", 
            
107
      "vocabulary_id": null
126
      "vocabulary_id": null
            
108
    }
127
    }
            
109
  ], 
128
  ], 
            
110
  "temporal_end": "2000-01-01", 
129
  "temporal_end": "2000-01-01", 
            
111
  "temporal_resolution": "", 
130
  "temporal_resolution": "", 
            
112
  "temporal_start": "1961-01-01", 
131
  "temporal_start": "1961-01-01", 
            
113
  "theme": "https://inspire.ec.europa.eu/theme/af", 
132
  "theme": "https://inspire.ec.europa.eu/theme/af", 
            
114
  "title": "GAEZ Global Agro-ecological Zones v3.0", 
133
  "title": "GAEZ Global Agro-ecological Zones v3.0", 
            
115
  "type": "dataset", 
134
  "type": "dataset", 
            
116
  "url": "https://webarchive.iiasa.ac.at/Research/LUC/GAEZv3.0/", 
135
  "url": "https://webarchive.iiasa.ac.at/Research/LUC/GAEZv3.0/", 
            
117
  "version": null, 
136
  "version": null, 
            
118
  "was_derived_from": ""
137
  "was_derived_from": ""
            
119
}
138
}